Acts Of Healing
Lent 4
3-19-23
For Beloved Community and Mountain Community Mennonite Churches
©Vernon K. Rempel, 2023
Lectionary reading from the Revised Common Lectionary:
John 9:1-17 NRSV
As Jesus walked along, he saw a man blind from birth. His disciples asked him, “Rabbi, who sinned, this man or his parents, that he was born blind?” Jesus answered, “Neither this man nor his parents sinned; he was born blind so that God’s works might be revealed in him. We must work the works of him who sent me while it is day; night is coming when no one can work. As long as I am in the world, I am the light of the world.” When he had said this, he spat on the ground and made mud with the saliva and spread the mud on the man’s eyes, saying to him, “Go, wash in the pool of Siloam” (which means Sent). Then he went and washed and came back able to see. The neighbors and those who had seen him before as a beggar began to ask, “Is this not the man who used to sit and beg?”
Some were saying, “It is he.” Others were saying, “No, but it is someone like him.” He kept saying, “I am the man.” But they kept asking him, “Then how were your eyes opened?” He answered, “The man called Jesus made mud, spread it on my eyes, and said to me, ‘Go to Siloam and wash.’ Then I went and washed and received my sight.” They said to him, “Where is he?” He said, “I do not know.”
They brought to the Pharisees the man who had formerly been blind. Now it was a sabbath day when Jesus made the mud and opened his eyes. Then the Pharisees also began to ask him how he had received his sight. He said to them, “He put mud on my eyes. Then I washed, and now I see.” Some of the Pharisees said, “This man is not from God, for he does not observe the sabbath.” But others said, “How can a man who is a sinner perform such signs?” And they were divided. So they said again to the blind man, “What do you say about him? It was your eyes he opened.” He said, “He is a prophet.”
I imagine being born blind,
and surviving into adulthood
in the ancient middle-east,
would require a good measure of luck,
and also developing some attitude.
And the poor disciples of Jesus,
for their part, once again
get to play the role of
those people who just don’t get it,
ask the question all Americans
are wanting to know these days:
Who is to blame here?
Republicans or Democrats?
Woke people or reactionaries?
Socialists or anarchists?
Or in this case, parents
or the man himself?
I remember when our children
were little, they used to ask
why some of the other kids
behaved the way they did.
Our stock answer tended to be:
either because of how they’re
being raised or because of their
own decisions – or both.
Jesus’ answer is singularly unsatisfactory.
No one is to blame.
He’s blind so that we can
observe God’s power at work now.
You kind of hope Jesus didn’t mean
the man was born blind
as a God-project to demonstrate power.
We hope Jesus meant,
the point here isn’t blame,
the point is what we’re
going to do about it.
And of course we will want to say,
it’s not always wrong to explore blame,
so that you can see who is actually
dumping the poison into the river,
that sort of thing – like Erin Brockovich:
how did that hexavalent chromium
get into our groundwater?
Jesus blamed a few people
in his travels as well:
the money changers in the temple,
talking about the “yeast of the Pharisees,”
and Herod, and so on.
But focusing on blame
can be a big trap,
and I think Jesus
recognized that:
the pointing of the finger
can often get you nothing,
plus, what do you have going on?
Are you so innocent and pure?
Remember to ask how God
might work, rather than
just sitting around wondering
whose fault stuff is.
Move forward with God,
might be the motto here.
This Lenten season,
we’re talking about “Truth and Reconciliation.”
I spoke about “Truth.”
Jeff worked last week with “Reconciliation.”
This week, it’s healing,
which can be considered
the good result of truth and reconciliation.
The phrase comes from the South African
efforts at overcoming devastating and cruel
years of apartheid by
telling the truth and seeking reconciliation.
This is different than assigning
blame and punishment.
It is an extraordinary accomplishment
that brought healing,
minimized violence –
removed violence by
removing violence,
rather than the attitude of
we just need to incarcerate
or kill the right people
and then we’ll be okay.
To read more, just start
with the Wikipedia article,
which also has a large
biography and many links included.
Some books to read:
Reconciliation: The Ubuntu Theology of Desmond Tutu, by Michael Jesse Battle and Desmond Tutu
No Future Without Forgiveness, by Desmond Tutu
Exclusion and Embrace: A Theological Exploration of Identity, Otherness, and Reconciliation, by Miroslav Volf
And the many books on restorative justice, including one on race by Fania Davis.
In a culture dedicated to the patterns
of crime and punishment,
we might consider what Jesus meant
by having God’s works
revealed in us.
Do we want to punish?
Or do we want to
do something different and constructive?
You may have noticed the word forgiveness
in the work of Tutu.
We might say that God’s power is
demonstrated in healing
when forgiveness means
untying our hands from the past
through work like truth and reconciliation
or restorative justice,
and then becoming free
to move in the world
the way we want to move.
Otherwise, we tend to lock ourselves
into grievance politics,
which gets us nowhere
except into more stuck places,
and more violence.
However we talk about,
it is pretty plain to see how
Jesus approach chooses
moving with God,
rather than sitting around
talking about blame.
That’s the great wonder:
How do we get to the healing?
How do we get to the
revelation of God’s good works?
Now the plot thickens
in our little story.
Jesus spits and makes mud
to put on the man’s eyes.
I don’t know why we have to
involve saliva, but here we are.
Do you believe in “eternal salivation?”
On the science side,
there are and were many
home remedies that involve
saliva, and if you look, for example,
in the book Gulp by Mary Roach,
you will learn that
saliva actually is a powerful
antiseptic, mucousy though it may be –
this is the gross-out portion
of the sermon –
(I have a joke related to this
that I’ll tell you off-line,
if you ask me to.)
So, having said all that,
it’s not clear people would
have considered it gross
for Jesus to use saliva,
maybe more like your
mother swabbing your
check with a damp finger.
Jesus accompanied this
with a sweet note about
being the light of the world –
do you want to blame someone
or be the light of the world?
The man goes and rinses
per instructions
and now he can see!
People are amazed.
An argument arises over
whether or not it’s the same guy.
And here’s where we start
to get attitude from the man himself.
He stands listening to all this,
and then simply says:
“I am the man” – does he add a “duh”
to the statement?
Does he roll his now-seeing eyes.
I’d be tempted to do so.
Then he has to repeat his story,
and then everyone wants
to know where Jesus is.
Now he just says
“I do not know.”
Like, I’m not in charge
of Jesus. I’m just the guy
that he healed.
Next the religious leaders
get involved – the Pharisees.
They want him to repeat
the story again, which he does.
And then the religious leaders
make their famous judgment:
this can’t be from God,
because he healed on the sabbath.
He restored sight to the blind,
but your worried about
your sabbath rules?!
It’s kind of like that old joke
about the first female pastor
of a church.
The elders have a tradition of
taking the new pastor out fishing
to get better acquainted.
So they duly take her
out on the lake.
But suddenly she says,
doggone it, I forgot my fishing tackle.
And she gets out of the boat,
walks on the water back to the shore
to retrieve her tackle.
One elder turns to the other:
Isn’t it just like a woman
to forget her tackle?
She walked on water!
He healed the man born blind!
Get the narrative here people.
So first of all,
would you rather blame someone
or get on with healing?
And second, would you rather
follow your rules and patterns
or get on with healing?
I think that it is the result
of trying to think creatively
about how to get on with healing,
that we have the powerful processes
of truth and reconciliation
and restorative justice.
This has little in common
with anointing Jesus king
over a heavily and lethally-armed
America.
This has little on common
with putting so many people
in prison that we are one of
the world leaders in imprisonment.
Not to mention that we’re
even willing to make money off of it.
This text eternally and powerfully asks us,
do you want to do what you’re doing,
or do you actually want
to get on with healing?
And we must note that
actually doing healing
may result in lots of awkward,
or angry, or insulting questions.
But it can also allow us to develop
a bit of attitude, a bit of
“light of the world”
joyful exuberance and assertiveness.
“This little light of mine,
I’m going to let it shine”:
for the healing works of God.
It’s kind of like what the poet Billy Collins recently said in noting that he’s glad he is no longer in the politicized classroom: “Right now, people are ready to be offended,” he said. “But I’m always ready to be delighted.”
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2023/03/20/a-new-york-poet-laureate-in-deepest-darkest-florida
Would we be offended or delighted
by the healing acts of Jesus?
Jesus says it all:
This is about God’s
works being revealed.
And as long as I’m in the world,
I am the light of the world.
Everything else pales
in comparison.
Thanks be to God.
Questions for discussion:
—What do you love most about this story?
—What do you find most puzzling or troubling in the story?
—Do you have any stories of healing: physically, emotionally, spiritually? What do we do when healing doesn’t come?
—Do you have any reflections about “truth and reconciliation” or “restorative justice” processes?